The Most-Read Classics
Catalogue  /  The Prince  /  By One'S Own Arms And Ability
The Prince · Niccolò Machiavelli

By One'S Own Arms And Ability

Let no one be surprised if, in speaking of entirely new principalities

as I shall do, I adduce the highest examples both of prince and of

state; because men, walking almost always in paths beaten by others,

and following by imitation their deeds, are yet unable to keep

entirely to the ways of others or attain to the power of those they

imitate. A wise man ought always to follow the paths beaten by great

men, and to imitate those who have been supreme, so that if his

ability does not equal theirs, at least it will savour of it. Let him

act like the clever archers who, designing to hit the mark which yet

appears too far distant, and knowing the limits to which the strength

of their bow attains, take aim much higher than the mark, not to reach

by their strength or arrow to so great a height, but to be able with

the aid of so high an aim to hit the mark they wish to reach.

I say, therefore, that in entirely new principalities, where there is

a new prince, more or less difficulty is found in keeping them,

accordingly as there is more or less ability in him who has acquired

the state. Now, as the fact of becoming a prince from a private

station presupposes either ability or fortune, it is clear that one or

other of these things will mitigate in some degree many difficulties.

Nevertheless, he who has relied least on fortune is established the

strongest. Further, it facilitates matters when the prince, having no

other state, is compelled to reside there in person.

But to come to those who, by their own ability and not through

fortune, have risen to be princes, I say that Moses, Cyrus, Romulus,

Theseus, and such like are the most excellent examples. And although

one may not discuss Moses, he having been a mere executor of the will

of God, yet he ought to be admired, if only for that favour which made

him worthy to speak with God. But in considering Cyrus and others who

have acquired or founded kingdoms, all will be found admirable; and if

their particular deeds and conduct shall be considered, they will not

be found inferior to those of Moses, although he had so great a

preceptor. And in examining their actions and lives one cannot see

that they owed anything to fortune beyond opportunity, which brought

them the material to mould into the form which seemed best to them.

Without that opportunity their powers of mind would have been

extinguished, and without those powers the opportunity would have come

in vain.

It was necessary, therefore, to Moses that he should find the people

of Israel in Egypt enslaved and oppressed by the Egyptians, in order

that they should be disposed to follow him so as to be delivered out

of bondage. It was necessary that Romulus should not remain in Alba,

and that he should be abandoned at his birth, in order that he should

become King of Rome and founder of the fatherland. It was necessary

that Cyrus should find the Persians discontented with the government

of the Medes, and the Medes soft and effeminate through their long

peace. Theseus could not have shown his ability had he not found the

Athenians dispersed. These opportunities, therefore, made those men

fortunate, and their high ability enabled them to recognize the

opportunity whereby their country was ennobled and made famous.

Those who by valorous ways become princes, like these men, acquire a

principality with difficulty, but they keep it with ease. The

difficulties they have in acquiring it rise in part from the new rules

and methods which they are forced to introduce to establish their

government and its security. And it ought to be remembered that there

is nothing more difficult to take in hand, more perilous to conduct,

or more uncertain in its success, then to take the lead in the

introduction of a new order of things. Because the innovator has for

enemies all those who have done well under the old conditions, and

lukewarm defenders in those who may do well under the new. This

coolness arises partly from fear of the opponents, who have the laws

on their side, and partly from the incredulity of men, who do not

readily believe in new things until they have had a long experience of

them. Thus it happens that whenever those who are hostile have the

opportunity to attack they do it like partisans, whilst the others

defend lukewarmly, in such wise that the prince is endangered along

with them.

It is necessary, therefore, if we desire to discuss this matter

thoroughly, to inquire whether these innovators can rely on themselves

or have to depend on others: that is to say, whether, to consummate

their enterprise, have they to use prayers or can they use force? In

the first instance they always succeed badly, and never compass

anything; but when they can rely on themselves and use force, then

they are rarely endangered. Hence it is that all armed prophets have

conquered, and the unarmed ones have been destroyed. Besides the

reasons mentioned, the nature of the people is variable, and whilst it

is easy to persuade them, it is difficult to fix them in that

persuasion. And thus it is necessary to take such measures that, when

they believe no longer, it may be possible to make them believe by

force.

If Moses, Cyrus, Theseus, and Romulus had been unarmed they could not

have enforced their constitutions for long--as happened in our time to

Fra Girolamo Savonarola, who was ruined with his new order of things

immediately the multitude believed in him no longer, and he had no

means of keeping steadfast those who believed or of making the

unbelievers to believe. Therefore such as these have great

difficulties in consummating their enterprise, for all their dangers

are in the ascent, yet with ability they will overcome them; but when

these are overcome, and those who envied them their success are

exterminated, they will begin to be respected, and they will continue

afterwards powerful, secure, honoured, and happy.

To these great examples I wish to add a lesser one; still it bears

some resemblance to them, and I wish it to suffice me for all of a

like kind: it is Hiero the Syracusan.[*] This man rose from a private

station to be Prince of Syracuse, nor did he, either, owe anything to

fortune but opportunity; for the Syracusans, being oppressed, chose

him for their captain, afterwards he was rewarded by being made their

prince. He was of so great ability, even as a private citizen, that

one who writes of him says he wanted nothing but a kingdom to be a

king. This man abolished the old soldiery, organized the new, gave up

old alliances, made new ones; and as he had his own soldiers and

allies, on such foundations he was able to build any edifice: thus,

whilst he had endured much trouble in acquiring, he had but little in

keeping.

[*] Hiero II, born about 307 B.C., died 216 B.C.

CHAPTER VII